
A prospect was interested in licensing our client’s technology, but in the course of qualifying the prospect Fuentek learned that the company’s rough estimates of sales would yield very little royalty revenue—approximately $3K per year.
This low value was hardly worth the effort of negotiating a licensing agreement, so we saw two options:
- Tell the prospect that our client wasn’t interested at this time and move on to other potential prospects or
- Try to create a bigger deal by changing the prospect’s perception of the technology’s value.
These new business opportunities changed the prospect’s perception of the technology, allowing the company to see the technology as a potentially integral part of its business. This had two positive effects for our client:
- The deal was much bigger because the prospect would have more products using the technology and therefore would be selling to more customers.
- A sense of urgency was created because the prospect now viewed the technology as relatively strategic (whereas originally the prospect viewed the technology as just nice to have).
Lesson learned: When looking at a potentially low-value licensing agreement, evaluate whether the prospect’s perception of the technology’s potential value could be expanded, thus expanding the value of the deal itself.
Have you had any similar experiences with licensing agreements? Leave a comment below, or start a conversation by contacting us.
– By Karen Hiser
I'm pleased to have discovered your blog via discussions in the LES LinkedIn Group. I too am involved in maximising university-industry-government research relationships in my work as an IP lawyer based in Vancouver. I enjoyed your comments on powerful ways to shape perception when negotiating research deals. Thanks very much.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Tamsin. We're glad you find our blog interesting and useful! You might also appreciate our other Insights on tech transfer, which are gathered together on our Web site: http://bit.ly/fggqCN
ReplyDelete